“We need a new definition of malnutrition. Malnutrition means under- and over-nutrition. Malnutrition means emaciated and obese.”
In your opinion, should the definition of malnutrition be expanded to encapsulate both ends of the consumption spectrum? Why or why not? It goes without saying that the conflicts that plague our Planet and its inhabitants are not easily fixable. However, were the definition of malnutrition to be expanded, how could the problems as a result of malnutrition be resolved? I guess what I’m trying to say is this: is it possible that under-nutrition and over-nutrition can both be combatted with the same diet?
I’ll share my opinion next week, but in the meantime, I can’t wait to hear your thoughts.
Until Next Week… Plan Well, Pack Well, Live Well,